From
this point onward I'll try to comment on the concept of rationality as
it is used by the political philosophers that have yet to follow: Locke and
Rousseau. Rationality is an interesting concept because, in the
18th century, the age of reason, it occupied an important role in any theory
about humankind and the manner in which he congregates. Rationality has been
both lauded and criticized and it appears in many different definitions.
Furthermore, because rationality is believed to be such an inherent part of
human nature, and because political philosophers merely derive their theories on politics from
their view of human nature, a research on
rationality is sure to come to some interesting conclusion.
This blog was initiated as an examination for a course at the University of Leiden. The course is called History of Modern Political Philosophy. It is taught by Antwerp-bound scholar Herbert de Vriese. This blog serves to give a short introduction to the subject, exploring some of the major themes of political philosophy: authority, legitimacy , obedience and societal values. The works that will be used to expound on these subjects are: Utopia by Thomas More, the Prince by Nicolo Machiavelli, Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, the Second Treatise of Government by John Locke, and the Social Contract by Jean-Jacques Rousseau.
Monday, 8 April 2013
Focus: Rationality
Now
that More, Machiavelli and Hobbes have all passed the revue, -each contributing
their own answers to perennial questions regarding political philosophy, it
seems only right that, in order to avoid repetition, and to add an agreeable
specificity to this blog, one particular topic should be singled out among
others which is to be focused on in more detail.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.